The Rising Tensions: Iran, Israel, and the U.S.
The Rising Tensions: Iran, Israel, and the U.S. |
Iran’s Nuclear Stance
Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program is solely for civilian
energy purposes. This stance has been backed by a “fatwa” or formal religious
ban on the acquisition, development, and use of nuclear weapons made by Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, in the 1990s. However, recent threats from
Israel against Iran’s nuclear facilities have led to a potential
reconsideration of this policy. Major General Ahmad Haghtalab, a senior Iranian
Revolutionary Guards commander, suggested that Iran might change its formal
nuclear doctrine if its nuclear facilities were directly attacked by Israel.
The Role of the U.S. and Sanctions
In response to Iran’s missile and drone attack on Israel, the U.S. announced
a fresh set of sanctions targeting the production of unarmed aerial vehicles
and companies tied to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the
defense ministry. The U.S. has designated the IRGC as a foreign terrorist
organization. President Joe Biden stated that the U.S. was acting in concert
with its allies to collectively increase economic pressure on Iran, with
additional sanctions on the way from Group of Seven nations.
The UK’s Response and the G7 Meeting
The UK also imposed sanctions on Iran’s drone and ballistic missile
industries. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak called Iran’s attack a “reckless act and
a dangerous escalation” of the regional conflict. These sanctions were
announced as foreign ministers from G7 nations, including U.S. Secretary of
State Antony Blinken, gathered in Italy.
The International Atomic Energy Agency’s Warning
The U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, has
repeatedly said that Iran is enriching uranium at levels close to weapons grade
that would enable it to build a nuclear bomb. Iran has repeatedly disputed
this.
The Israeli Public’s Opinion
Israelis are split over what is an appropriate response to Iran’s attack on
April 13. According to a survey by researchers at the Hebrew University of
Jerusalem, slightly more than half (52%) believe Israel shouldn’t respond,
while 48% favor Israel responding even if it means extending the current round
of the conflict with Iran.
No comments: